Computing on private data

Both secure multiparty computation and differential privacy protect the privacy of data used in computation, but each has advantages in different contexts.

Many of today’s most innovative computation-based products and solutions are fueled by data. Where those data are private, it is essential to protect them and to prevent the release of information about data subjects, owners, or users to the wrong parties. How can we perform useful computations on sensitive data while preserving privacy?

Related content
Technique that mixes public and private training data can meet differential-privacy criteria while cutting error increase by 60%-70%.

We will revisit two well-studied approaches to this challenge: secure multiparty computation (MPC) and differential privacy (DP). MPC and DP were invented to address different real-world problems and to achieve different technical goals. However, because they are both aimed at using private information without fully revealing it, they are often confused. To help draw a distinction between the two approaches, we will discuss the power and limitations of both and give typical scenarios in which each can be highly effective.

We are interested in scenarios in which multiple individuals (sometimes, society as a whole) can derive substantial utility from a computation on private data but, in order to preserve privacy, cannot simply share all of their data with each other or with an external party.

Secure multiparty computation

MPC methods allow a group of parties to collectively perform a computation that involves all of their private data while revealing only the result of the computation. More formally, an MPC protocol enables n parties, each of whom possesses a private dataset, to compute a function of the union of their datasets in such a way that the only information revealed by the computation is the output of the function. Common situations in which MPC can be used to protect private interests include

  • auctions: the winning bid amount should be made public, but no information about the losing bids should be revealed;
  • voting: the number of votes cast for each option should be made public but not the vote cast by any one individual;
  • machine learning inference: secure two-party computation enables a client to submit a query to a server that holds a proprietary model and receive a response, keeping the query private from the server and the model private from the client.
Related content
New approach to homomorphic encryption speeds up the training of encrypted machine learning models sixfold.

Note that the number n of participants can be quite small (e.g., two in the case of machine learning inference), moderate in size, or very large; the latter two size ranges both occur naturally in auctions and votes. Similarly, the participants may be known to each other (as they would be, for example, in a departmental faculty vote) or not (as, for example, in an online auction). MPC protocols mathematically guarantee the secrecy of input values but do not attempt to hide the identities of the participants; if anonymous participation is desired, it can be achieved by combining MPC with an anonymous-communication protocol.

Although MPC may seem like magic, it is implementable and even practical using cryptographic and distributed-computing techniques. For example, suppose that Alice, Bob, Carlos, and David are four engineers who want to compare their annual raises. Alice selects four random numbers that sum to her raise. She keeps one number to herself and gives each of the other three to one of the other engineers. Bob, Carlos, and David do the same with their own raises.

Secure multiparty computation
Four engineers wish to compute their average raise, without revealing any one engineer's raise to the others. Each selects four numbers that sum to his or her raise and sends three of them to the other engineers. Each engineer then sums his or her four numbers — one private number and three received from the others. The sum of all four engineers' sums equals the sum of all four raises.

After everyone has distributed the random numbers, each engineer adds up the numbers he or she is holding and sends the sum to the others. Each engineer adds up these four sums privately (i.e., on his or her local machine) and divides by four to get the average raise. Now they can all compare their raises to the team average.

Alice's share
Bob's share
Carlos's share
David's share
Sum of sums
Alice's raise
Bob's raise
Carlos's raise
David's raise

Note that, because Alice (like Bob, Carlos, and David) kept part of her raise private (the bold numbers), no one else learned her actual raise. When she summed the numbers she was holding, the sum didn’t correspond to anyone’s raise. In fact, Bob’s sum was negative, because all that matters is that the four chosen numbers add up to the raise; the sign and magnitude of these four numbers are irrelevant.

Summing all of the engineers’ sums results in the same value as summing the raises directly, namely $12,686. If all of the engineers follow this protocol faithfully, dividing this value by four yields the team average raise of $3,171.50, which allows each person to compare his or her raise against the team average (locally and hence privately) without revealing any salary information.

A highly readable introduction to MPC that emphasizes practical protocols, some of which have been deployed in real-world scenarios, can be found in a monograph by Evans, Kolesnikov, and Rosulek. Examples of real-world applications that have been deployed include analysis of gender-based wage gaps in Boston-area companies, aggregate adoption of cybersecurity measures, and Covid exposure notification. Readers may also wish to read our previous blog post on this and related topics.

Differential privacy

Differential privacy (DP) is a body of statistical and algorithmic techniques for releasing an aggregate function of a dataset without revealing the mapping between data contributors and data items. As in MPC, we have n parties, each of whom possesses a data item. Either the parties themselves or, more often, an external agent wishes to compute an aggregate function of the parties’ input data.

Related content
Calibrating noise addition to word density in the embedding space improves utility of privacy-protected text.

If this computation is performed in a differentially private manner, then no information that could be inferred from the output about the ith input, xi, can be associated with the individual party Pi. Typically, the number n of participants is very large, the participants are not known to each other, and the goal is to compute a statistical property of the set {x1, …, xn} while protecting the privacy of individual data contributors {P1, …, Pn}.

In slightly more detail, we say that a randomized algorithm M preserves differential privacy with respect to an aggregation function f if it satisfies two properties. First, for every set of input values, the output of M closely approximates the value of f. Second, for every distinct pair (xi, xi') of possible values for the ith individual input, the distribution of M(x1, …, xi,…, xn) is approximately equivalent to the distribution of M(x1, …, xi′, …, xn). The maximum “distance” between the two distributions is characterized by a parameter, ϵ, called the privacy parameter, and M is called an ϵ-differentially private algorithm.

Note that the output of a differentially private algorithm is a random variable drawn from a distribution on the range of the function f. That is because DP computation requires randomization; in particular, it works by “adding noise.” All known DP techniques introduce a salient trade-off between the privacy parameter and the utility of the output of the computation. Smaller values of ϵ produce better privacy guarantees, but they require more noise and hence produce less-accurate outputs; larger values of ϵ yield worse privacy bounds, but they require less noise and hence deliver better accuracy.

For example, consider a poll, the goal of which is to predict who is going to win an election. The pollster and respondents are willing to sacrifice some accuracy in order to improve privacy. Suppose respondents P1, …, Pn have predictions x1, …, xn, respectively, where each xi is either 0 or 1. The poll is supposed to output a good estimate of p, which we use to denote the fraction of the parties who predict 1. The DP framework allows us to compute an accurate estimate and simultaneously to preserve each respondent’s “plausible deniability” about his or her true prediction by requiring each respondent to add noise before sending a response to the pollster.

Related content
Private aggregation of teacher ensembles (PATE) leads to word error rate reductions of more than 26% relative to standard differential-privacy techniques.

We now provide a few more details of the polling example. Consider the algorithm m that takes as input a bit xi and flips a fair coin. If the coin comes up tails, then m outputs xi; otherwise m flips another fair coin and outputs 1 if heads and 0 if tails. This m is known as the randomized response mechanism; when the pollster asks Pi for a prediction, Pi responds with m(xi). Simple statistical calculation shows that, in the set of answers that the pollster receives from the respondents, the expected fraction that are 1’s is

Pr[First coin is tails] ⋅ p + Pr[First coin is heads] ⋅ Pr[Second coin is heads] = p/2 + 1/4.

Thus, the expected number of 1’s received is n(p/2 + 1/4). Let N = m(x1) + ⋅⋅⋅ + m(xn) denote the actual number of 1’s received; we approximate p by M(x1, …, xn) = 2N/n − 1/2. In fact, this approximation algorithm, M, is differentially private. Accuracy follows from the statistical calculation, and privacy follows from the “plausible deniability” provided by the fact that M outputs 1 with probability at least 1/4 regardless of the value of xi.

Differential privacy has dominated the study of privacy-preserving statistical computation since it was introduced in 2006 and is widely regarded as a fundamental breakthrough in both theory and practice. An excellent overview of algorithmic techniques in DP can be found in a monograph by Dwork and Roth. DP has been applied in many real-world applications, most notably the 2020 US Census.

The power and limitations of MPC and DP

We now review some of the strengths and weaknesses of these two approaches and highlight some key differences between them.

Secure multiparty computation

MPC has been extensively studied for more than 40 years, and there are powerful, general results showing that it can be done for all functions f using a variety of cryptographic and coding-theoretic techniques, system models, and adversary models.

Despite the existence of fully general, secure protocols, MPC has seen limited real-world deployment. One obstacle is protocol complexity — particularly the communication complexity of the most powerful, general solutions. Much current work on MPC addresses this issue.

Related content
A privacy-preserving version of the popular XGBoost machine learning algorithm would let customers feel even more secure about uploading sensitive data to the cloud.

More-fundamental questions that must be answered before MPC can be applied in a given scenario include the nature of the function f being computed and the information environment in which the computation is taking place. In order to explain this point, we first note that the set of participants in the MPC computation is not necessarily the same as the set of parties that receive the result of the computation. The two sets may be identical, one may be a proper subset of the other, they may have some (but not all) elements in common, or they may be entirely disjoint.

Although a secure MPC protocol (provably!) reveals nothing to the recipients about the private inputs except what can be inferred from the result, even that may be too much. For example, if the result is the number of votes for and votes against a proposition in a referendum, and the referendum passes unanimously, then the recipients learn exactly how each participant voted. The referendum authority can avoid revealing private information by using a different f, e.g., one that is “YES” if the number of votes for the proposition is at least half the number of participants and “NO” if it is less than half.

This simple example demonstrates a pervasive trade-off in privacy-preserving computation: participants can compute a function that is more informative if they are willing to reveal private information to the recipients in edge cases; they can achieve more privacy in edge cases if they are willing to compute a less informative function.

In addition to specifying the function f carefully, users of MPC must evaluate the information environment in which MPC is to be deployed and, in particular, must avoid the catastrophic loss of privacy that can occur when the recipients combine the result of the computation with auxiliary information. For example, consider the scenario in which the participants are all of the companies in a given commercial sector and metropolitan area, and they wish to use MPC to compute the total dollar loss that they (collectively) experienced in a given year that was attributable to data breaches; in this example, the recipients of the result are the companies themselves.

Related content
Scientists describe the use of privacy-preserving machine learning to address privacy challenges in XGBoost training and prediction.

Suppose further that, during that year, one of the companies suffered a severe breach that was covered in the local media, which identified the company by name and reported an approximate dollar figure for the loss that the company suffered as a result of the breach. If that approximate figure is very close to the total loss imposed by data breaches on all the companies that year, then the participants can conclude that all but one of them were barely affected by data breaches that year.

Note that this potentially sensitive information is not leaked by the MPC protocol, which reveals nothing but the aggregate amount lost (i.e., the value of the function f). Rather, it is inferred by combining the result of the computation with information that was already available to the participants before the computation was done. The same risk that input privacy will be destroyed when results are combined with auxiliary information is posed by any computational method that reveals the exact value of the function f.

Differential privacy

The DP framework provides some elegant, simple mechanisms that can be applied to any function f whose output is a vector of real numbers. Essentially, one can independently perturb or “noise up” each component of f(x) by an appropriately defined random value. The amount of noise that must be added in order to hide the contribution (or, indeed, the participation) of any single data subject is determined by the privacy parameter and the maximum amount by which a single input can change the output of f. We explain one such mechanism in slightly more mathematical detail in the following paragraph.

One can apply the Laplace mechanism with privacy parameter ϵ to a function f, whose outputs are k-tuples of real numbers, by returning the value f(x1, …, xn) + (Y1, …, Yk) on input (x1, …, xn), where the Yi are independent random variables drawn from the Laplace distribution with parameter Δ(f)/ϵ. Here Δ(f) denotes the 1sensitivity of the function f, which captures the magnitude by which a single individual’s data can change the output of f in the worst case. The technical definition of the Laplace distribution is beyond the scope of this article, but for our purposes, its important property is that the Yi can be sampled efficiently.

Related content
The team’s latest research on privacy-preserving machine learning, federated learning, and bias mitigation.

Crucially, DP protects data contributors against privacy loss caused by post-processing computational results or by combining results with auxiliary information. The scenario in which privacy loss occurred when the output of an MPC protocol was combined with information from an existing news story could not occur in a DP application; moreover, no harm could be done by combining the result of a DP computation with auxiliary information in a future news story.

DP techniques also benefit from powerful composition theorems that allow separate differentially private algorithms to be combined in one application. In particular, the independent use of an ϵ1-differentially private algorithm and an ϵ2-differentially private algorithm, when taken together, is (ϵ1 + ϵ2)-differentially private.

One limitation on the applicability of DP is the need to add noise — something that may not be tolerable in some application scenarios. More fundamentally, the ℓ1 sensitivity of a function f, which yields an upper bound on the amount of noise that must be added to the output in order to achieve a given privacy parameter ϵ, also yields a lower bound. If the output of f is strongly influenced by the presence of a single outlier in the input, then it is impossible to achieve strong privacy and high accuracy simultaneously.

For example, consider the simple case in which f is the sum of all of the private inputs, and each input is an arbitrary positive integer. It is easy to see that the ℓ1 sensitivity is unbounded in this case; to hide the contribution or the participation of an individual whose data item strongly dominates those of all other individuals would require enough noise to render the output meaningless. If one can restrict all of the private inputs to a small interval [a,b], however, then the Laplace mechanism can provide meaningful privacy and accuracy.

DP was originally designed to compute statistical aggregates while preserving the privacy of individual data subjects; in particular, it was designed with real-valued functions in mind. Since then, researchers have developed DP techniques for non-numerical computations. For example, the exponential mechanism can be used to solve selection problems, in which both input and output are of arbitrary type.

Related content
Amazon is helping develop standards for post-quantum cryptography and deploying promising technologies for customers to experiment with.

In specifying a selection problem, one must define a scoring function that maps input-output pairs to real numbers. For each input x, a solution y is better than a solution y′ if the score of (x,y) is greater than that of (x,y′). The exponential mechanism generally works well (i.e., achieves good privacy and good accuracy simultaneously) for selection problems (e.g., approval voting) that can be defined by scoring functions of low sensitivity but not for those (e.g., set intersection) in which the scoring function must have high sensitivity. In fact, there is no differentially private algorithm that works well for set intersection; by contrast, MPC for set intersection is a mature and practical technology that has seen real-world deployment.


In conclusion, both secure multiparty computation and differential privacy can be used to perform computations on sensitive data while preserving the privacy of those data. Important differences between the bodies of technique include

  • The nature of the privacy guarantee: Use of MPC to compute a function y = f(x1, x2, ..., xn) guarantees that the recipients of the result learn the output y and nothing more. For example, if there are exactly two input vectors that are mapped to y by f, the recipients of the output y gain no information about which of two was the actual input to the MPC computation, regardless of the number of components in which these two input vectors differ or the magnitude of the differences. On the other hand, for any third input vector that does not map to y, the recipient learns with certainty that the real input to the MPC computation was not this third vector, even if it differs from one of the first two in only one component and only by a very small amount. By contrast, computing f with a DP algorithm guarantees that, for any two input vectors that differ in only one component, the (randomized!) results of the computation are approximately indistinguishable, regardless of whether the exact values of f on these two input vectors are equal, nearly equal, or extremely different. Straightforward use of composition yields a privacy guarantee for inputs that differ in c components at the expense of increasing the privacy parameter by a factor of c.
  • Typical use cases: DP techniques are most often used to compute aggregate properties of very large datasets, and typically, the identities of data contributors are not known. None of these conditions is typical of MPC use cases.
  • Exact vs. noisy answers: MPC can be used to compute exact answers for all functions f. DP requires the addition of noise. This is not a problem in many statistical computations, but even small amounts of noise may not be acceptable in some application scenarios. Moreover, if f is extremely sensitive to outliers in the input data, the amount of noise needed to achieve meaningful privacy may preclude meaningful accuracy.
  • Auxiliary information: Combining the result of a DP computation with auxiliary information cannot result in privacy loss. By contrast, any computational method (including MPC) that returns the exact value y of a function f runs the risk that a recipient of y might be able to infer something about the input data that is not implied by y alone, if y is combined with auxiliary information.

Finally, we would like to point out that, in some applications, it is possible to get the benefits of both MPC and DP. If the goal is to compute f, and g is a differentially private approximation of f that achieves good privacy and accuracy simultaneously, then one natural way to proceed is to use MPC to compute g. We expect to see both MPC and DP used to enhance data privacy in Amazon’s products and services.

Related content

US, MA, North Reading
We are looking for experienced scientists and engineers to explore new ideas, invent new approaches, and develop new solutions in the areas of Controls, Dynamic modeling and System identification. Are you inspired by invention? Is problem solving through teamwork in your DNA? Do you like the idea of seeing how your work impacts the bigger picture? Answer yes to any of these and you’ll fit right in here at Amazon Robotics. We are a smart team of doers that work passionately to apply cutting edge advances in robotics and software to solve real-world challenges that will transform our customers’ experiences in ways we can’t even imagine yet. We invent new improvements every day. We are Amazon Robotics and we will give you the tools and support you need to invent with us in ways that are rewarding, fulfilling and fun. Key job responsibilities Applied Scientists take on big unanswered questions and guide development team to state-of-the-art solutions. We want to hear from you if you have deep industry experience in the Mechatronics domain and : * the ability to think big and conceive of new ideas and novel solutions; * the insight to correctly identify those worth exploring; * the hands-on skills to quickly develop proofs-of-concept; * the rigor to conduct careful experimental evaluations; * the discipline to fast-fail when data refutes theory; * and the fortitude to continue exploring until your solution is found We are open to hiring candidates to work out of one of the following locations: North Reading, MA, USA | Westborough, MA, USA
GB, London
We are looking for detail-oriented, organized, and responsible individuals who are eager to learn how to work with large and complicated data sets. Some knowledge of econometrics, as well as basic familiarity with Python or R is necessary, and experience with SQL and UNIX would be a plus. These are full-time positions at 40 hours per week, with compensation being awarded on an hourly basis. You will learn how to build data sets and perform applied econometric analysis at Internet speed collaborating with economists, scientists, and product managers. These skills will translate well into writing applied chapters in your dissertation and provide you with work experience that may help you with placement. Roughly 85% of previous cohorts have converted to full time economics employment at Amazon. If you are interested, please send your CV to our mailing list at We are open to hiring candidates to work out of one of the following locations: London, GBR
IN, KA, Bengaluru
Job Description ATE (Analytics, Technology and Engineering) is a multi-disciplinary team of scientists, engineers, and technicians, all working to innovate in operations for the benefit of our customers. Our team is responsible for creating core analytics, science capabilities, platforms development and data engineering. We develop scalable analytics applications and research modeling to optimize operation processes.. You will work with professional software development managers, data engineers, data scientists, applied scientists, business intelligence engineers and product managers using rigorous quantitative approaches to ensure high quality data tech products for our customers around the world, including India, Australia, Brazil, Mexico, Singapore and Middle East. We are on the lookout for an enthusiastic and highly analytical individual to be a part of our journey. Amazon is growing rapidly and because we are driven by faster delivery to customers, a more efficient supply chain network, and lower cost of operations, our main focus is in the development of strategic models and automation tools fed by our massive amounts of available data. You will be responsible for building these models/tools that improve the economics of Amazon’s worldwide fulfillment networks in emerging countries as Amazon increases the speed and decreases the cost to deliver products to customers. You will identify and evaluate opportunities to reduce variable costs by improving fulfillment center processes, transportation operations and scheduling, and the execution to operational plans. You will also improve the efficiency of capital investment by helping the fulfillment centers to improve storage utilization and the effective use of automation. Finally, you will help create the metrics to quantify improvements to the fulfillment costs (e.g., transportation and labor costs) resulting from the application of these optimization models and tools. Major responsibilities include: · In this role, you will be responsible for developing and implementing innovative, scalable models and tools aimed at tackling novel challenges within Amazon’s global fulfillment network. Collaborating with fellow scientists from various teams, you will work on integrated solutions to enhance fulfillment speed, reduce costs. Your in-depth comprehension of business challenges will enable you to provide scientific analyses that underpin critical business decisions, utilizing a diverse range of methodologies. You’ll have the opportunity to design scientific tool platforms, deploy models, create efficient data pipelines, and streamline existing processes. Join us in shaping the future of Amazon’s global retail business by optimizing delivery speed at scale and making a lasting impact on the world of e-commerce. If you’re passionate about solving complex problems and driving innovation, we encourage you to apply. About the team This team is responsible for applying science based algo and techniques to solve the problems in operation and supply chain. Some of these problems include, volume forecasting, capacity planning, fraud detection, scenario simulation and using LLM/GenAI for process efficiency We are open to hiring candidates to work out of one of the following locations: Bengaluru, KA, IND
IL, Tel Aviv
Are you passionate about pushing the boundaries of computer vision, generative AI, deep learning, and machine learning? Ready to tackle challenges in document understanding at scale? We’re looking for innovative minds to join our world-class team at AWS, where you’ll collaborate with leading researchers, academics, and engineers on Amazon Textract. Why AWS? Be part of the leading cloud service provider powering innovation and positive impact. Work on real-world problems alongside tech and business giants. Access to unlimited data and computational resources. Collaborate with world-class researchers and developers. Deploy solutions at AWS scale and publish your work at top conferences. Focus Areas: - LLMs, document understanding, scene text recognition. - Visual question answering, NLP+vision, layout understanding. Locations: Tel Aviv and Haifa Think you’re a fit? Dive into the world of AWS Computer Vision and help us innovate at the forefront of technology. Key job responsibilities - Design cutting-edge neural network architectures. - Create document understanding solutions for complex scenarios and large visual datasets. - Set benchmarks and success criteria for model performance. - Collaborate across AWS and Amazon to bring scientific breakthroughs to our customers. - Add your unique creativity to our multidisciplinary team. - Mentor junior scientists and interns/PhD students. We are open to hiring candidates to work out of one of the following locations: Haifa, ISR | Tel Aviv, ISR
LU, Luxembourg
Have you ever wished to build high standard Operations Research and Machine Learning algorithms to optimize one of the most complex logistics network? Have you ever ordered a product on Amazon websites and wondered how it got delivered to you so fast, and what kinds of algorithms & processes are running behind the scenes to power the whole operation? If so, this role is for you. The team: Global transportation services, Research and applied science - Operations is at the heart of the Amazon customer experience. Each action we undertake is on behalf of our customers, as surpassing their expectations is our passion. We improve customer experience through continuously optimizing the complex movements of goods from vendors to customers throughout Europe. - Global transportation analytical teams are transversal centers of expertise, composed of engineers, analysts, scientists, technical program managers and developers. We are focused on Amazon most complex problems, processes and decisions. We work with fulfillment centers, transportation, software developers, finance and retail teams across the world, to improve our logistic infrastructure and algorithms. - GTS RAS is one of those Global transportation scientific team. We are obsessed by delivering state of the art OR and ML tools to support the rethinking of our advanced end-to-end supply chain. Our overall mission is simple: we want to implement the best logistics network, so Amazon can be the place where our customers can be delivered the next-day. The role: Applied scientist, speed and long term network design The person in this role will have end-to-end ownership on augmenting RAS Operation Research and Machine Learning modeling tools. They will help understand where are the constraints in our transportation network, and how we can remove them to make faster deliveries at a lower cost. You will be responsible for designing and implementing state-of-the-art algorithmic in transportation planning and network design, to expand the scope of our Operations Research and Machine Learning tools, to reflect the constantly evolving constraints in our network. You will enable the creation of a product that drives ever-greater automation, scalability and optimization of every aspect of transportation, planning the best network and modeling the constraints that prevent us from offering more speed to our customer, to maximize the utilization of the associated resources. The impact of your work will be in the Amazon EU global network. The product you will build will span across multiple organizations that play a role in Amazon’s operations and transportation and the shopping experience we deliver to customer. Those stakeholders include fulfilment operations and transportation teams; scientists and developers, and product managers. You will understand those teams constraints, to include them in your product; you will discuss with technical teams across the organization to understand the existing tools and assess the opportunity to integrate them in your product.You will engage with fellow scientists across the globe, to discuss the solutions they have implemented and share your peculiar expertise with them. This is a critical role and will require an aptitude for independent initiative and the ability to drive innovation in transportation planning and network design. Successful candidates should be able to design and implement high quality algorithm solutions, using state-of-the art Operations Research and Machine Learning techniques. Key job responsibilities - Engage with stakeholders to understand what prevents them to build a better transportation network for Amazon - Review literature to identify similar problems, or new solving techniques - Build the mathematical model representing your problem - Implement light version of the model, to gather early feed-back from your stakeholders and fellow scientists - Implement the final product, leveraging the highest development standards - Share your work in internal and external conferences - Train on the newest techniques available in your field, to ensure the team stays at the highest bar About the team GTS Research and Applied Science is a team of scientists and engineers whom mission is to build the best decision support tools for strategic decisions. We model and optimize Amazon end-to-end operations. The team is composed of enthusiastic members, that love to discuss any scientific problem, foster new ideas and think out of the box. We are eager to support each others and share our unique knowledge to our colleagues. We are open to hiring candidates to work out of one of the following locations: Luxembourg, LUX
US, CA, Santa Clara
Amazon AI is looking for world class scientists and engineers to join its AWS AI Labs. This group is entrusted with developing core data mining, natural language processing, deep learning, and machine learning algorithms for AWS. You will invent, implement, and deploy state of the art machine learning algorithms and systems. You will build prototypes and explore conceptually new solutions. You will interact closely with our customers and with the academic community. You will be at the heart of a growing and exciting focus area for AWS and work with other acclaimed engineers and world famous scientists. Inclusive Team Culture Here at AWS, we embrace our differences. We are committed to furthering our culture of inclusion. We have ten employee-led affinity groups, reaching 40,000 employees in over 190 chapters globally. We have innovative benefit offerings, and host annual and ongoing learning experiences, including our Conversations on Race and Ethnicity (CORE) and AmazeCon (gender diversity) conferences. Work/Life Balance Our team puts a high value on work-life balance. It isn’t about how many hours you spend at home or at work; it’s about the flow you establish that brings energy to both parts of your life. We believe striking the right balance between your personal and professional life is critical to life-long happiness and fulfillment. We offer flexibility in working hours and encourage you to find your own balance between your work and personal lives. Mentorship & Career Growth Our team is dedicated to supporting new members. We have a broad mix of experience levels and tenures, and we’re building an environment that celebrates knowledge sharing and mentorship. Our senior members enjoy one-on-one mentoring and thorough, but kind, code reviews. We care about your career growth and strive to assign projects based on what will help each team member develop into a better-rounded engineer and enable them to take on more complex tasks in the future. We are open to hiring candidates to work out of one of the following locations: New York, NY, USA | Santa Clara, CA, USA | Seattle, WA, USA
DE, BE, Berlin
Are you excited about developing state-of-the-art computer vision models that revolutionize Amazon’s Fulfillment network? Are you looking for opportunities to apply AI on real-world problems at truly vast scale? At Amazon Fulfillment Technologies and Robotics, we are on a mission to build high-performance autonomous systems that perceive and act to further improve our world-class customer experience — at Amazon scale. To this end, we are looking for an Applied Scientist who will build and deploy models that make smarter decisions on a wide array of multi-modal signals. Together, we will be pushing beyond the state of the art in optimizing one of the most complex systems in the world: Amazon's Fulfillment Network. Key job responsibilities In this role, you will build computer vision and multi-modal deep learning models that understand the state of products and packages flowing through Amazon’s fulfillment network. You will build models that solve challenging problems like product identification and damage detection on Amazon's entire retail catalog (billions of different items, thousands of new items every day). You will primarily work with very large real-world vision datasets, as well as a diverse set of multi-modal datasets, including natural language and structured data. You will face a high level of research ambiguity and problems that require creative, ambitious, and inventive solutions. A day in the life AFT AI delivers the AI solutions that empower Amazon’s fulfillment network to make smarter decisions. You will work on an interdisciplinary team of scientists and engineers with deep expertise in developing cutting-edge AI solutions at scale. You will work with images, videos, natural language, and sequences of events from existing or new hardware. You will adapt state-of-the-art machine learning and computer vision techniques to develop solutions for business problems in the Amazon Fulfillment Network. About the team Amazon Fulfillment Technologies (AFT) powers Amazon’s global fulfillment network. We invent and deliver software, hardware, and science solutions that orchestrate processes, robots, machines, and people. We harmonize the physical and virtual world so Amazon customers can get what they want, when they want it. AFT AI is spread across multiple locations in NA (Bellevue WA and Nashville, TN) and Europe (Berlin, Germany). We are hiring candidates to work out of the Berlin location. Publicly available articles showcasing some of our work: - Damage Detection: - Product ID: We are open to hiring candidates to work out of one of the following locations: Berlin, BE, DEU
US, WA, Redmond
Project Kuiper is an initiative to launch a constellation of Low Earth Orbit satellites that will provide low-latency, high-speed broadband connectivity to unserved and underserved communities around the world. We are searching for talented candidates with experience in spaceflight trajectory modeling and simulation, orbit mechanics, and launch vehicle mission planning. Key job responsibilities This position requires experience in simulation and analysis of astrodynamics models and spaceflight trajectories. Strong analysis skills are required to develop engineering studies of complex large-scale dynamical systems. This position requires demonstrated expertise in computational analysis automation and tool development. Working with the Kuiper engineering team, you will: - Develop modeling techniques for analysis and simulation of deployment dynamics of multiple satellites - Support Project Kuiper’s Launch Vehicle Mission Management team with technical expertise in Launch Vehicle trajectory requirements specification - Develop tools to support Mission Management planning for over 80 launches! - Work collaboratively with launch vehicle system technical teams Export Control Requirement: Due to applicable export control laws and regulations, candidates must be a U.S. citizen or national, U.S. permanent resident (i.e., current Green Card holder), or lawfully admitted into the U.S. as a refugee or granted asylum. We are open to hiring candidates to work out of one of the following locations: Redmond, WA, USA
US, WA, Seattle
Innovators wanted! Are you an entrepreneur? A builder? A dreamer? This role is part of an Amazon Special Projects team that takes the company’s Think Big leadership principle to the extreme. We focus on creating entirely new products and services with a goal of positively impacting the lives of our customers. No industries or subject areas are out of bounds. If you’re interested in innovating at scale to address big challenges in the world, this is the team for you. Here at Amazon, we embrace our differences. We are committed to furthering our culture of inclusion. We have thirteen employee-led affinity groups, reaching 40,000 employees in over 190 chapters globally. We are constantly learning through programs that are local, regional, and global. Amazon’s culture of inclusion is reinforced within our 16 Leadership Principles, which remind team members to seek diverse perspectives, learn and be curious, and earn trust. Our team highly values work-life balance, mentorship and career growth. We believe striking the right balance between your personal and professional life is critical to life-long happiness and fulfillment. We care about your career growth and strive to assign projects and offer training that will challenge you to become your best. We are open to hiring candidates to work out of one of the following locations: Seattle, WA, USA
US, WA, Seattle
Innovators wanted! Are you an entrepreneur? A builder? A dreamer? This role is part of an Amazon Special Projects team that takes the company’s Think Big leadership principle to the extreme. We focus on creating entirely new products and services with a goal of positively impacting the lives of our customers. No industries or subject areas are out of bounds. If you’re interested in innovating at scale to address big challenges in the world, this is the team for you. Here at Amazon, we embrace our differences. We are committed to furthering our culture of inclusion. We have thirteen employee-led affinity groups, reaching 40,000 employees in over 190 chapters globally. We are constantly learning through programs that are local, regional, and global. Amazon’s culture of inclusion is reinforced within our 16 Leadership Principles, which remind team members to seek diverse perspectives, learn and be curious, and earn trust. As a Applied Scientist at the intersection of machine learning and the life sciences, you will participate in developing exciting products for customers. Our team rewards curiosity while maintaining a laser-focus in bringing products to market. Competitive candidates are responsive, flexible, and able to succeed within an open, collaborative, entrepreneurial, startup-like environment. At the cutting edge of both academic and applied research in this product area, you have the opportunity to work together with a diverse and talented team of scientists, engineers, and product managers and collaborate with others teams. We are open to hiring candidates to work out of one of the following locations: Seattle, WA, USA