Customer-obsessed science
Research areas
-
March 20, 202615 min readSimplifying and clarifying the assembly code for core operations enabled automated optimization and verification.
-
March 19, 202611 min read
-
February 25, 202611 min read
-
February 17, 20263 min read
-
Featured news
-
2026Large Language Model (LLM) judges exhibit strong reasoning capabilities but are limited to textual content. This leaves current automatic Speech-to-Speech (S2S) evaluation methods reliant on opaque and expensive Audio Language Models (ALMs). In this work, we propose TRACE (Textual Reasoning over Audio Cues for Evaluation), a novel framework that enables LLM judges to reason over audio cues to achieve cost-efficient
-
EACL 2026, NeurIPS 2025 Workshop on Continual and Compatible Foundation Model Updates2026Large Language Models (LLMs) suffer from severe catastrophic forgetting when adapted sequentially to new tasks in a continual learning (CL) setting. Existing approaches are fundamentally limited: replay-based methods are impractical and could potentially violate privacy, while strict orthogonality-based methods collapse under scale: each new task is projected onto an orthogonal complement, progressively
-
2026Reinforcement learning (RL) has re-emerged as a natural approach for training interactive LLM agents in real-world environments. However, directly applying the widely used Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) algorithm to multi-turn tasks exposes notable limitations, particularly in scenarios requiring long-horizon reasoning. To address these challenges, we investigate more stable and effective advantage
-
2026Diffusion language models (DLMs) have recently emerged as a compelling alternative to autoregressive generation, offering parallel generation and improved global coherence. During inference, DLMs generate text by iteratively denoising masked sequences in parallel; however, determining which positions to unmask and which tokens to commit forms a large combinatorial search problem. Existing inference methods
-
2026Reasoning about failures is crucial for building reliable and trustworthy robotic systems. Prior approaches either treat failure reasoning as a closed-set classification problem or assume access to ample human annotations. Failures in the real world are typically subtle, combinatorial, and difficult to enumerate, whereas rich reasoning labels are expensive to acquire. We address this problem by introducing
Collaborations
View allWhether you're a faculty member or student, there are number of ways you can engage with Amazon.
View all